(sorry, wieder schlicht Englisch)

John Pilger setzt sich (Link weg) mit Obamas "100 Tagen" auseinander.
Und er demontiert gründlcihe die Legende von der neuen Politik - der neue Kurs reduziert sich auf ein geändertes Marketing ".. in a country desperate to be rid of George W Bush." (der "Angry Arab" beispielsweise schreibt ja auch von "Bushama" ;-)

Also bei Pilger nachlesen (wo acu immer das inzwischen zu finden wäre), so z.B.:
No one knew what the new brand actually stood for. So accomplished was the advertising (a record $75m was spent on television commercials alone) that many Americans actually believed Obama shared their opposition to Bush’s wars. In fact, he had repeatedly backed Bush’s warmongering and its congressional funding. Many Americans also believed he was the heir to Martin Luther King’s legacy of anti-colonialism. Yet if Obama had a theme at all, apart from the vacuous “Change you can believe in”, it was the renewal of America as a dominant, avaricious bully. “We will be the most powerful,” he often declared.